Dwayne Wilson v. Ed Sheldon
| ED SHELDON, Warden |
| DWAYNE WILSON |
| 19-3732 |
| August 5, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER filed: This case is REMANDED to the district court for consideration of whether Wilsons time for filing a notice of appeal should have been extended. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5). While on limited remand, Wilsons appeal is held in abeyance. Upon ruling, the district court shall return the case to this court for further proceedings, as may be appropriate. Entered by order of the court. (BSM) [Entered: 10/01/2019 03:11 PM]
|
| Filing 11 RESPONSE filed to the show cause for jurisdiction - late noa, [ # 3 ]. Response filed by Party Mr. Dwayne Wilson. (BSM) [Entered: 09/10/2019 10:59 AM] |
| Filing 10 copy of RE22 motion to extend time until 8/1/2019 in which to gain access to the law library and to have all the required paperwork filed for his rightful appeal to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals with memorandum in support. from district court filed. (BSM) [Entered: 09/04/2019 03:24 PM] |
| Filing 9 APPEARANCE filed for Appellee Ed Sheldon by Jerri L. Fosnaught. Certificate of Service: 09/03/2019. [19-3732] (JLF) [Entered: 09/03/2019 02:35 PM] |
| Filing 8 Appellant MOTION filed by Mr. Dwayne Wilson for appointment of counsel. Certificate of service: 08/19/2019. (BSM) [Entered: 08/28/2019 10:23 AM] |
| Filing 7 Prisoner trust account statement filed. (BSM) [Entered: 08/28/2019 10:20 AM] |
| Filing 6 Financial Affidavit filed by Party Mr. Dwayne Wilson Certificate of Service: 08/19/2019. (BSM) [Entered: 08/28/2019 10:20 AM] |
| Filing 5 Appellant MOTION filed by Mr. Dwayne Wilson to proceed in forma pauperis. Certificate of service: 08/19/2019. (BSM) [Entered: 08/28/2019 10:20 AM] |
| Filing 3 SHOW CAUSE order filed to have Appellant Mr. Dwayne Wilson show cause for possible jurisdictional defect involving the filing of a late notice of appeal. Response due by 09/05/2019 for Dwayne Wilson. (BSM) [Entered: 08/15/2019 08:43 AM] |
| Filing 4 Copy of District Court Order filed: The Motion (Doc. 22) is denied as moot. This Court certifies an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), 2253(c). R# 25 filed 08/06/2019 (BSM) [Entered: 08/15/2019 08:50 AM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Briston Mitchell (BSM) [Entered: 08/05/2019 02:41 PM] |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Case Docketed with certificate of appealability denied. R# 19 & 20 filed 05/06/2019. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Dwayne Wilson. Transcript needed: n. (BSM) [Entered: 08/05/2019 01:17 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Dwayne Wilson v. Ed Sheldon | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: ED SHELDON, Warden | |
| Represented By: | Jerri L. Fosnaught |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: DWAYNE WILSON | |
| Represented By: | Dwayne Wilson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
