USA v. Dwyon Moore
Defendant / Appellant: DWYON MOORE
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 19-4185
Filed: December 5, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 5, 2019 Filing 3 RULING to extend appointment of Mr. Nathan A. Ray for Dwyon Moore as counsel under the Criminal Justice Act. (KSF) [Entered: 12/05/2019 10:27 AM]
December 5, 2019 Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Karen Fultz. (KSF) [Entered: 12/05/2019 10:27 AM]
December 5, 2019 Filing 1 Criminal Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Dwyon Moore. Transcript needed: y. (KSF) [Entered: 12/05/2019 10:25 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Dwyon Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: DWYON MOORE
Represented By: Nathan A. Ray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: John Curtis Hanley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?