Thomas Aquila, II v. LaShann Eppinger
| LASHANN EPPINGER, Warden |
| THOMAS AQUILA, II |
| 19-4208 |
| December 12, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER filed to dismiss as a duplicate appeal of case number 19-3901. 6th Cir. R. 45(a)(8). (AEG) [Entered: 12/13/2019 08:56 AM]
|
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Amy Gigliotti (AEG) [Entered: 12/12/2019 10:17 AM] |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Case Docketed with certificate of appealability denied. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Thomas Aquila, II. Transcript needed: n. (AEG) [Entered: 12/12/2019 10:11 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Thomas Aquila, II v. LaShann Eppinger | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: LASHANN EPPINGER, Warden | |
| Represented By: | M. Scott Criss |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: THOMAS AQUILA, II | |
| Represented By: | Thomas Aquila II |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
