In re: Frank Skinner
| In re: FRANK SKINNER |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 19-5139 |
| February 19, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 RULING LETTER SENT granting respondent's motion to extend time to respond to the second successive petition [ # 11 ] filed by Ms. Lorraine Craig. The response is now due May 1, 2019. (LAJ) [Entered: 04/05/2019 02:39 PM] |
| Filing 11 MOTION filed by Ms. Lorraine Craig for USA to extend time to file response to petition for second successive. Certificate of Service: 04/05/2019. [19-5139] (LC) [Entered: 04/05/2019 12:47 PM] |
| Filing 10 RULING LETTER SENT granting respondent's motion to extend time to respond to the second or successive application [ # 9 ] filed by Ms. Lorraine Craig. The response is now due April 11, 2019. (LAJ) [Entered: 03/28/2019 03:35 PM] |
| Filing 9 MOTION filed by Ms. Lorraine Craig for USA to extend time to file response to petition for second successive. Certificate of Service: 03/28/2019. [19-5139] (LC) [Entered: 03/28/2019 03:27 PM] |
Filing 7
ORDER filed: The motion to hold the case in abeyance will not be addressed at this time. The movant remains obliged to submit a corrected application, and the March 21, 2019 deadline for returning the corrected application remains in effect. (LAJ) [Entered: 03/13/2019 02:58 PM]
|
| Filing 8 Corrected second successive motion filed by Frank Skinner. If the respondent chooses to file a response it is due by March 28, 2019. Certificate of Service: 03/06/2019. (LAJ) [Entered: 03/14/2019 12:59 PM] |
| Filing 6 Movant MOTION filed by Frank Skinner to hold case in abeyance pending a Supreme Court decision in USA v. Davis. Certificate of service: 02/19/2019. (LAJ) [Entered: 03/08/2019 03:20 PM] |
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE filed for Respondent USA by Lorraine Craig. Certificate of Service: 02/20/2019. [19-5139] (LC) [Entered: 02/20/2019 11:39 AM] |
| Filing 4 The case manager for this case is: Laura Jones (LAJ) [Entered: 02/19/2019 02:24 PM] |
| Filing 3 RULING LETTER SENT directing Movant Frank Skinner to file a corrected second successive habeas motion in the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals by 3/21/19. (LAJ) [Entered: 02/19/2019 01:32 PM] |
| Filing 2 Copy of District Court Order filed to transfer proceedings to Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. (LAJ) [Entered: 02/19/2019 01:30 PM] |
| Filing 1 Second Successive Motion transferred from District Court. Notice filed by Movant Frank Skinner. 2nd/Successive Motion Received in 6CA: 02/13/2019. (LAJ) [Entered: 02/19/2019 01:28 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Frank Skinner | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Lorraine Craig |
| Represented By: | Kevin G. Ritz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: FRANK SKINNER | |
| Represented By: | Frank Skinner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
