USA v. Tyslen Baker
| TYSLEN J. BAKER |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 19-5636 |
| June 13, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 RULING to extend appointment of Mr. Michael Trent Lee for Tyslen J. Baker as counsel under the Criminal Justice Act. (CAM) [Entered: 06/13/2019 09:48 AM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: C. Anthony Milton (CAM) [Entered: 06/13/2019 09:48 AM] |
| Filing 1 Criminal Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Tyslen J. Baker. Transcript needed: y. (CAM) [Entered: 06/13/2019 09:46 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Tyslen Baker | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: TYSLEN J. BAKER | |
| Represented By: | Michael Trent Lee |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Seth A. Hancock |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
