USA v. Javier Martinez-Bohorquez
JAVIER MARTINEZ-BOHORQUEZ |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
19-6159 |
October 11, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 RULING to extend appointment of Mr. Patrick F. Nash for Javier Martinez-Bohorquez as counsel under the Criminal Justice Act. (SSS) [Entered: 10/11/2019 10:59 AM] |
Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Sharday Swain (SSS) [Entered: 10/11/2019 10:59 AM] |
Filing 1 Criminal Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Javier Martinez-Bohorquez. Transcript needed: y. (SSS) [Entered: 10/11/2019 10:57 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: USA v. Javier Martinez-Bohorquez | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: JAVIER MARTINEZ-BOHORQUEZ | |
Represented By: | Patrick F. Nash |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Cynthia T. Rieker |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.