In Re: Lee Hall
| In re: LEE HALL |
| TONY MAYS, Warden |
| 19-6349 |
| December 4, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 UNPUBLISHED ORDER filed: The motion to remand case [ # 8 ], request to file a second or successive petition, and the motion to stay execution [ # 9 ] are DENIED. Decision not for publication. Raymond M. Kethledge, Amul R. Thapar, and Eric E. Murphy, Circuit Judges. (CL) [Entered: 12/04/2019 02:40 PM] |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE in opposition filed regarding a motion, [ # 1 ]; previously filed by Lee Hall, regarding a motion, [ # 8 ]; previously filed by Mr. Stephen Alan Ferrell for Lee Hall. Response from Attorney Mr. John H. Bledsoe for Respondent Tony Mays Certificate of Service:12/04/2019. [19-6349] (JHB) [Entered: 12/04/2019 11:58 AM] |
| Filing 9 MOTION filed by Mr. Stephen Alan Ferrell for Lee Hall to stay execution date. Certificate of Service: 12/04/2019. [19-6349] (SAF) [Entered: 12/04/2019 11:33 AM] |
| Filing 8 MOTION filed by Mr. Stephen Alan Ferrell for Lee Hall to remand. Certificate of Service: 12/04/2019. [19-6349] (SAF) [Entered: 12/04/2019 10:37 AM] |
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE filed for Respondent Tony Mays by John H. Bledsoe. Certificate of Service: 12/04/2019. [19-6349] (JHB) [Entered: 12/04/2019 10:16 AM] |
Filing 6
ORDER filed: The district court has transferred the movants petition for habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2254 and motion to stay execution to this court for consideration as to whether to grant leave to file a second or successive habeas corpus petition. Given this transfer, the parties are DIRECTED to make any supplemental filings in this appellate proceeding by 12:00 noon, today, Wednesday, December 4, 2019. Entered by order of the court. (PJE) [Entered: 12/04/2019 09:02 AM]
|
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE filed for Movant Lee Hall by Stephen A. Ferrell. Certificate of Service: 12/04/2019. [19-6349] (SAF) [Entered: 12/04/2019 08:24 AM] |
| Filing 4 The case manager for this case is: Patricia J. Elder (PJE) [Entered: 12/04/2019 06:44 AM] |
| Filing 3 Copy of R.6 filed 12-2-19 Motion to stay 12/5/19 execution transferred to this Court from district court filed. (PJE) [Entered: 12/04/2019 06:43 AM] |
| Filing 2 Copy of District Court Order filed 12-3-19 (R.15) to transfer proceedings to to the Sixth Circuit as a second/successive habeas petition. (PJE) [Entered: 12/04/2019 06:42 AM] |
| Filing 1 TRANSFERRED Second Successive Death Penalty Case Docketed. Notice filed by Movant Lee Hall. 2nd/Successive Motion Received in 6CA: 12/03/2019. (PJE) [Entered: 12/04/2019 06:32 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In Re: Lee Hall | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: LEE HALL | |
| Represented By: | Stephen Alan Ferrell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: TONY MAYS, Warden | |
| Represented By: | John H. Bledsoe |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
