University of Michigan, et alIn re: University of Michigan, et al
| E. ROYSTER HARPER, In re: UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, LAURA BLAKE JONES, ROBERT SELLERS, MARTIN PHILBERT, PAUL ROBINSON, BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, ERIK WESSEL, SUZANNE MCFADDEN and PAMELA HEATLIE |
| JOHN DOE |
| 20-1248 |
| March 16, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 MOTION filed by Ms. Deborah L. Gordon for John Doe to extend time to file brief. Certificate of Service: 03/17/2020. [20-1248] (DLG) [Entered: 03/17/2020 04:27 PM] |
| Filing 13 APPEARANCE filed for Respondent John Doe by Elizabeth Marzotto Taylor. Certificate of Service: 03/17/2020. [20-1248] (EAM) [Entered: 03/17/2020 02:50 PM] |
| Filing 12 APPEARANCE filed for Respondent John Doe by Deborah L. Gordon. Certificate of Service: 03/17/2020. [20-1248] (DLG) [Entered: 03/17/2020 02:48 PM] |
| Filing 11 LETTER SENT to Ms. Deborah L. Gordon for John Doe, notifying that party has an opportunity to respond to motion stay district court order. Response due 03/19/2020 by 5:00 p.m. for Deborah L. Gordon. (RB) [Entered: 03/17/2020 02:33 PM] |
| Filing 10 **DOCUMENT LOCKED - INCORRECT ELECTRONIC FILING - COUNSEL WILL BE INSTRUCTED WHEN THE FORMS MAY BE FILED** AMICUS APPEARANCE filed for John Doe by Elizabeth Marzotto Taylor. Certificate of Service: 03/17/2020. [20-1248]--[Edited 03/17/2020 by RB] (EAM) [Entered: 03/17/2020 10:56 AM] |
| Filing 9 **DOCUMENT LOCKED - INCORRECT ELECTRONIC FILING - COUNSEL WILL BE INSTRUCTED WHEN THE FORMS MAY BE FILED** AMICUS APPEARANCE filed for John Doe by Deborah L. Gordon. Certificate of Service: 03/17/2020. [20-1248]--[Edited 03/17/2020 by RB] (DLG) [Entered: 03/17/2020 10:50 AM] |
| Filing 8 MOTION filed by Stephen Joseph Cowen for Board of Regents of the University of Michigan and University of Michigan to stay district court order, to stay injunction pending appeal. Certificate of Service: 03/16/2020. [20-1248] (SJC) [Entered: 03/16/2020 10:16 PM] |
| Filing 7 ***DUPLICATE ENTRY - VERIFIED THAT ONLY ONE FILING FEE HAS BEEN PAID** Original Proceeding fee paid Stephen Joseph Cowen for Board of Regents of the University of Michigan and University of Michigan. Fee Amount: $500.00 Receipt Number: A06-68397-738.. [20-1248]--[Edited 03/17/2020 by RB] (SJC) [Entered: 03/16/2020 09:25 PM] |
| Filing 6 Original Proceeding fee paid Stephen Joseph Cowen for Board of Regents of the University of Michigan and University of Michigan. Fee Amount: $500.00 Receipt Number: A06-68397-738.. [20-1248] (SJC) [Entered: 03/16/2020 09:25 PM] |
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE filed for Petitioners Board of Regents of the University of Michigan and University of Michigan by Andrew J. Clopton. Certificate of Service: 03/16/2020. [20-1248] (AJC) [Entered: 03/16/2020 08:59 PM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE filed for Petitioners Board of Regents of the University of Michigan and University of Michigan by Amanda K. Rice. Certificate of Service: 03/16/2020. [20-1248] (AKR) [Entered: 03/16/2020 08:56 PM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE filed for Petitioners Board of Regents of the University of Michigan and University of Michigan by Stephen J. Cowen. Certificate of Service: 03/16/2020. [20-1248] (SJC) [Entered: 03/16/2020 08:52 PM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Robin Baker (RB) [Entered: 03/16/2020 03:57 PM] |
| Filing 1 Writ of Mandamus filed. Notice filed by Petitioners Board of Regents of the University of Michigan and University of Michigan. Petition Received in 6CA: 03/16/2020. (RB) [Entered: 03/16/2020 03:55 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
