Joseph Pagan v. Matt Macauley
| MATT MACAULEY, Warden |
| JOSEPH JAMES PAGAN |
| 20-1675 |
| July 15, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Copy of District Court Order (RE 17) filed 7/21/2020 granting in forma pauperis. (KSF) [Entered: 07/22/2020 08:32 AM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Karen Fultz. (KSF) [Entered: 07/15/2020 02:42 PM] |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Case Docketed with certificate of appealability denied. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Joseph James Pagan. Transcript needed: n. (KSF) [Entered: 07/15/2020 02:39 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Joseph Pagan v. Matt Macauley | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: MATT MACAULEY, Warden | |
| Represented By: | Andrea M. Christensen-Brown |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: JOSEPH JAMES PAGAN | |
| Represented By: | Joseph James Pagan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.