Robert Gee v. Connie Horton
ROBERT EARL GEE |
CONNIE HORTON, Warden |
20-1704 |
July 23, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Copy of District Court Order filed granting in forma pauperis. (BSM) [Entered: 08/12/2020 09:36 AM] |
Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Briston Mitchell (BSM) [Entered: 07/23/2020 02:44 PM] |
Filing 1 Prisoner Case Docketed with certificate of appealability denied. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Robert Earl Gee. Transcript needed: n. (BSM) [Entered: 07/23/2020 02:41 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Robert Gee v. Connie Horton | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: ROBERT EARL GEE | |
Represented By: | Robert Earl Gee |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: CONNIE HORTON, Warden | |
Represented By: | Jared D. Schultz |
Represented By: | Andrea M. Christensen-Brown |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.