USA v. Steven Dang
| STEVEN JOURNY DANG |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 20-2122 |
| November 17, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE filed for Appellee USA by Erin K. Lane. Certificate of Service: 11/17/2020. [20-2122] (EL) [Entered: 11/17/2020 03:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Mr. Roy G. Ford (513) 564-7016 (RGF) [Entered: 11/17/2020 01:02 PM] |
| Filing 1 Criminal Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Steven Journy Dang. Transcript needed: y. (RGF) [Entered: 11/17/2020 01:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Steven Dang | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: STEVEN JOURNY DANG | |
| Represented By: | Frank E. Stanley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Erin Lane |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
