Chadwick Miller v. City of Akron, OH Police Dept, et al
| CITY OF AKRON, OH FIRE DEPARTMENT/EMS and CITY OF AKRON, OH POLICE DEPARTMENT |
| CHADWICK LYNN MILLER |
| 20-3040 |
| January 9, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER filed: Appeal No. 20-3040 is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction [ # 7 ] [ # 5 ]. Richard Allen Griffin, Raymond M. Kethledge and Jane Branstetter Stranch, Circuit Judges. (RLJ) [Entered: 02/21/2020 09:00 AM]
|
| Filing 7 Appellant MOTION filed by Mr. Chadwick Lynn Miller for appointment of counsel. Certificate of service: 01/26/2020. (RLJ) [Entered: 01/31/2020 08:10 AM] |
| Filing 6 Financial Affidavit filed by Party Mr. Chadwick Lynn Miller Certificate of Service: 01/26/2000. (RLJ) [Entered: 01/31/2020 08:10 AM] |
| Filing 5 Appellant MOTION filed by Mr. Chadwick Lynn Miller to proceed in forma pauperis. Certificate of service: 01/26/2020. (RLJ) [Entered: 01/31/2020 08:08 AM] |
| Filing 4 CORRESPONDENCE: copy of RE 7 in district court - notice of appeal by Mr. Chadwick Lynn Miller (received in Sixth Circuit 01/02/20). (RLJ) [Entered: 01/09/2020 10:20 AM] |
| Filing 3 Defendant not served in district court, complaint dismissed prior to service. (RLJ) [Entered: 01/09/2020 09:33 AM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Robin L. Johnson. (RLJ) [Entered: 01/09/2020 09:33 AM] |
| Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Chadwick Lynn Miller. Transcript needed: n. (RLJ) [Entered: 01/09/2020 09:27 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
