Price Montgomery v. Maurice Ferentino, et al
| JEFF DUTTON, ROBERT MACKLIN, TIMOTHY RUSH, CHARLOTTE DANIEL, JENNIFER FRAZZINI, R. WYMAN, NEIL CARMEN, AMY SULLIVAN, aka Amy Bundy, ALPHONSO EVANS, SEAN DAUGHERTY, MICHAEL PUGH, LISA ANTONUCCI, JACK MODELSKI, MARZELLE TURNER, JENNIFER MCINTOSH, JAMIE BALL, LATOSIA AUSTIN, ANNA COX, CHRISTOPHER LAROSE, MAURICE FERENTINO, CAPTAIN DRAGOVICH, DENNIS JOHNSON, ROBERT IUZZOLINO, DAVID YEMMA, PATRICIA MACKLIN and LAURA BEDDARD |
| PRICE MONTGOMERY |
| 20-3114 |
| January 30, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 MANDATE ISSUED with no costs taxed. (RLB) [Entered: 04/19/2021 03:14 PM] |
| Filing 19 NOTIFICATION filed by Mr. Price Montgomery regarding address change. (CAM) [Entered: 03/16/2021 10:30 AM] |
| Filing 18 The case manager for this case is now: C. Anthony Milton (AEG) [Entered: 03/02/2021 09:54 AM] |
Filing 17
ORDER filed: AFFIRMED; pursuant to FRAP 34(a)(2)(C). Decision not for publication. Alan E. Norris, Circuit Judge; Helene N. White, Circuit Judge and John K. Bush, Circuit Judge. (BLC) [Entered: 02/24/2021 01:42 PM]
|
| Filing 16 APPELLANT BRIEF filed by Mr. Price Montgomery Certificate of Service:11/29/2020. Argument Request: not received. (BLC) [Entered: 12/04/2020 03:36 PM] |
| Filing 15 RULING LETTER SENT grantingin part motion to extend time to file brief [ # 14 ] filed by Mr. Price Montgomery., resetting pro se briefing schedule: Appellant brief now due 11/30/2020. The request for appointment of counsel will be considered at a later date. (BLC) [Entered: 10/22/2020 02:55 PM] |
| Filing 14 Appellant MOTION filed by Mr. Price Montgomery to extend time to file brief, for appointment of counsel. (BLC) [Entered: 10/22/2020 02:53 PM] |
| Filing 13 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting pro se briefing schedule: Appellant brief due 10/16/2020. (BLC) [Entered: 09/03/2020 08:08 AM] |
| Filing 12 Update fee status change to paid. Receipt number 44660005554. (BLC) [Entered: 09/03/2020 08:07 AM] |
|
Filing 11
ORDER filed: For the reasons discussed by the district court, the appeal appears to lack an arguable basis in law and thus appears frivolous. Accordingly, the court DENIES the motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Unless Montgomery pays the 505.00 filing fee to the district court within thirty days of the entry of this order, this appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. [ # 6 ] Ralph B. Guy, Jr., Circuit Judge. (BLC) [Entered: 07/31/2020 09:11 AM]
|
| Filing 10 The case manager for this case is now: Bryant L. Crutcher (LAJ) [Entered: 06/09/2020 12:25 PM] |
|
Filing 9
ORDER filed to reinstate case. (JE) [Entered: 03/13/2020 03:17 PM]
|
| Filing 8 Prisoner trust account statement filed. (JE) [Entered: 03/13/2020 03:15 PM] |
| Filing 7 Financial Affidavit filed by Party Mr. Price Montgomery Certificate of Service: 02/28/2020. (JE) [Entered: 03/13/2020 03:14 PM] |
| Filing 6 Appellant MOTION filed by Mr. Price Montgomery to proceed in forma pauperis. Certificate of service: 02/28/2020. (JE) [Entered: 03/13/2020 03:14 PM] |
|
Filing 5
ORDER filed to dismiss for want of prosecution. (JE) [Entered: 03/10/2020 09:23 AM]
|
| Filing 4 Copy of appeal packet sent to district court for filing. (JE) [Entered: 01/31/2020 07:55 AM] |
| Filing 3 Defendant not served in district court, complaint dismissed prior to service. (JE) [Entered: 01/30/2020 03:09 PM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Jennifer Earl (JE) [Entered: 01/30/2020 03:09 PM] |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Price Montgomery. Transcript needed: n. (JE) [Entered: 01/30/2020 03:05 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
