William Echols v. Douglas Fender
DOUGLAS FENDER, Warden |
WILLIAM ECHOLS |
20-3124 |
February 4, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 APPEARANCE filed for Appellee Douglas Fender by William H. Lamb. Certificate of Service: 02/04/2020. [20-3124] (WHL) [Entered: 02/04/2020 01:04 PM] |
Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Briston Mitchell (BSM) [Entered: 02/04/2020 12:08 PM] |
Filing 1 Prisoner Case Docketed with certificate of appealability denied. Notice filed by Appellant William Echols. Transcript needed: n. (BSM) [Entered: 02/04/2020 12:06 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: William Echols v. Douglas Fender | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: DOUGLAS FENDER, Warden | |
Represented By: | William H. Lamb |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: WILLIAM ECHOLS | |
Represented By: | William Echols |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.