In re: Stephen Whitt
| In re: STEPHEN H. WHITT |
| TIM SHOOP, Warden |
| 20-3785 |
| July 24, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 RULING LETTER SENT directing Movant Stephen H. Whitt to file a corrected second successive habeas motion. Corrected motion due 08/24/2020. (CAM) [Entered: 07/24/2020 09:52 AM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: C. Anthony Milton (CAM) [Entered: 07/24/2020 09:47 AM] |
| Filing 1 Second Successive Motion Docketed. Notice filed by Movant Stephen H. Whitt. 2nd/Successive Motion Received in 6CA: 07/20/2020. (CAM) [Entered: 07/24/2020 09:45 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Stephen Whitt | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: STEPHEN H. WHITT | |
| Represented By: | Stephen H. Whitt |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: TIM SHOOP, Warden | |
| Represented By: | M. Scott Criss |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
