Robert BatesIn re: Robert Bates
Petitioner: In re: ROBERT BATES
Respondent: HAROLD MAY, Warden
Case Number: 20-3818
Filed: August 3, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 3, 2020 Filing 3 The case manager for this case is: Briston MItchell (BSM) [Entered: 08/03/2020 03:01 PM]
August 3, 2020 Filing 2 RULING LETTER SENT directing Movant Mr. Robert Bates to file a corrected second successive habeas motion. (BSM) [Entered: 08/03/2020 02:59 PM]
August 3, 2020 Filing 1 Second Successive Motion Docketed. Notice filed by Movant Mr. Robert Bates. 2nd/Successive Motion Received in 6CA: 07/22/2020. (BSM) [Entered: 08/03/2020 02:57 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Robert BatesIn re: Robert Bates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: HAROLD MAY, Warden
Represented By: Gregory T. Hartke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: In re: ROBERT BATES
Represented By: Robert Bates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?