Samuel Winkfield
| In re: SAMUEL WINKFIELD |
| CHERRY LINDAMOOD, Warden |
| 20-5192 |
| February 20, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE filed for Respondent Cherry Lindamood by Zachary L. Barker. Certificate of Service: 02/21/2020. [20-5192] (ZLB) [Entered: 02/21/2020 04:37 PM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Karen Fultz. (KSF) [Entered: 02/20/2020 03:08 PM] |
| Filing 1 Second Successive Motion Docketed. Notice filed by Movant Mr. Samuel Winkfield. 2nd/Successive Motion Received in 6CA: 02/19/2020. (KSF) [Entered: 02/20/2020 02:48 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Samuel Winkfield | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: SAMUEL WINKFIELD | |
| Represented By: | Samuel Winkfield |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: CHERRY LINDAMOOD, Warden | |
| Represented By: | John H. Bledsoe |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
