Phillip Roberts v. Coffee County, TN, et al
Defendant / Appellee: JOHN CARROLL, CHASE STRANGE, DAKOTA LILES and COFFEE COUNTY, TN
Plaintiff / Appellant: PHILLIP ROBERTS
Case Number: 20-5194
Filed: February 20, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
October 21, 2020 Phillip Roberts v. Coffee County, Tenn.

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 18, 2020 Filing 7 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting briefing schedule: appellant brief due 04/27/2020; appellee brief due 05/27/2020. (REO) [Entered: 03/18/2020 09:46 AM]
March 18, 2020 Filing 6 Copy of District Court Order filed granting in forma pauperis. (REO) [Entered: 03/18/2020 09:42 AM]
March 6, 2020 Filing 5 APPEARANCE filed for Appellees John Carroll, Coffee County, TN, Dakota Liles and Chase Strange by Jeffrey R. Thompson. Certificate of Service: 03/06/2020. [20-5194] (JRT) [Entered: 03/06/2020 01:13 PM]
March 6, 2020 Filing 4 APPEARANCE filed for Appellant Phillip Roberts by Paul Andrew Justice III. Certificate of Service: 03/06/2020. [20-5194] (PAJ) [Entered: 03/06/2020 12:03 PM]
March 6, 2020 Filing 3 Update fee status change to pending in the district court. (REO) [Entered: 03/06/2020 11:44 AM]
February 20, 2020 Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Ryan Orme (REO) [Entered: 02/20/2020 03:30 PM]
February 20, 2020 Filing 1 Prisoner Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Phillip Roberts. Transcript needed: n. (REO) [Entered: 02/20/2020 03:25 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Phillip Roberts v. Coffee County, TN, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JOHN CARROLL
Represented By: Gina Sarli Vogel
Represented By: Jeffrey R. Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CHASE STRANGE
Represented By: Gina Sarli Vogel
Represented By: Jeffrey R. Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DAKOTA LILES
Represented By: Gina Sarli Vogel
Represented By: Jeffrey R. Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: COFFEE COUNTY, TN
Represented By: Gina Sarli Vogel
Represented By: Jeffrey R. Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: PHILLIP ROBERTS
Represented By: Paul Andrew Justice III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?