In re: Damiean Tolson
| In re: DAMIEAN DEVON TOLSON |
| MIKE PARRIS, Warden |
| 20-5298 |
| March 19, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE filed for Respondent Mike Parris by Zachary L. Barker. Certificate of Service: 03/20/2020. [20-5298] (ZLB) [Entered: 03/20/2020 06:01 PM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Antoinette Macon (ASM) [Entered: 03/19/2020 09:41 AM] |
| Filing 1 Second Successive Motion Docketed. Notice filed by Movant Mr. Damiean Devon Tolson. 2nd/Successive Motion Received in 6CA: 03/18/2020. (ASM) [Entered: 03/19/2020 09:35 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Damiean Tolson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MIKE PARRIS, Warden | |
| Represented By: | John H. Bledsoe |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: DAMIEAN DEVON TOLSON | |
| Represented By: | Damiean Devon Tolson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
