Richie Mayes v. M. Rozalski, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: RICHIE E. MAYES
Defendant / Appellee: COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY AMANDA PARKER, DETECTIVE M. ROZALSKI, LEXINGTON PUBLIC DEFENDER, OFFICER ADAM ACREE and OFFICER C. COLEMAN
Case Number: 20-5364
Filed: April 8, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 13, 2020 Filing 10 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting pro se briefing schedule: Appellant brief due 06/25/2020. (BLC) [Entered: 05/13/2020 01:22 PM]
May 13, 2020 Filing 9 Copy of District Court Order filed granting in forma pauperis. (BLC) [Entered: 05/13/2020 01:01 PM]
April 29, 2020 Filing 8 Update fee status change to due. (BLC) [Entered: 04/29/2020 04:13 PM]
April 28, 2020 Filing 7 Financial Affidavit filed by Party Richie E. Mayes. (BLC) [Entered: 04/29/2020 04:11 PM]
April 28, 2020 Filing 6 Appellant MOTION filed by Richie E. Mayes to proceed in forma pauperis. (BLC) [Entered: 04/29/2020 04:10 PM]
April 13, 2020 Filing 5 Deficiency notice filed. Compliance due within 28 days. (BLC) [Entered: 04/13/2020 07:25 AM]
April 8, 2020 Filing 4 Update fee status change to due. (BLC) [Entered: 04/08/2020 10:58 AM]
April 8, 2020 Filing 3 Defendant not served in district court, complaint dismissed prior to service. (BLC) [Entered: 04/08/2020 10:52 AM]
April 8, 2020 Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Brryant Crutcher: 513-564-7013. (BLC) [Entered: 04/08/2020 10:52 AM]
April 8, 2020 Filing 1 Prisoner Case Docketed. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Richie E. Mayes. Hearing held: n. (BLC) [Entered: 04/08/2020 10:43 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Richie Mayes v. M. Rozalski, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: RICHIE E. MAYES
Represented By: Richie E. Mayes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY AMANDA PARKER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DETECTIVE M. ROZALSKI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: LEXINGTON PUBLIC DEFENDER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: OFFICER ADAM ACREE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: OFFICER C. COLEMAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?