Ronny Walker v. Scott Jordan, et al
| COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, KATHY LITTERAL and SCOTT JORDAN, Warden |
| RONNY DEVIOD WALKER |
| 20-5411 |
| April 21, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Update fee status change to pending in the district court. (CB) [Entered: 06/10/2020 10:16 AM] |
| Filing 8 LETTER SENT to parties advising of new caption. (CB) [Entered: 05/15/2020 08:10 AM] |
Filing 6
ORDER filed : This appeal is DISMISSED as it applies to the November 13, 2019 judgment. Only issues regarding the April 3, 2020 order may be argued on appeal.Eric L. Clay, Circuit Judge; John M. Rogers, Circuit Judge and Eric E. Murphy, Circuit Judge. (CB) [Entered: 05/14/2020 08:06 AM]
|
| Filing 5 LETTER SENT to Ronny Deviod Walker, advising that his ifp documents have been received in this court. He has an ifp motion pending at the district court, if that is denied, we will then file his documents that he has submitted here. (CB) [Entered: 05/05/2020 07:08 AM] |
| Filing 4 CORRESPONDENCE: Request for addl time to file ifp documents by Ronny Deviod Walker. (CB) [Entered: 05/05/2020 07:07 AM] |
| Filing 3 Update fee status change to pending in the district court. (CB) [Entered: 04/21/2020 10:11 AM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Cheryl Borkowski (CB) [Entered: 04/21/2020 10:10 AM] |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Case Docketed with certificate of appealability denied. Notice filed by Appellant Ronny Deviod Walker. Transcript needed: n. (CB) [Entered: 04/21/2020 10:07 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
