DeAndre Blake v. Johnny Fitz
JOHNNY FITZ, Acting Warden |
DEANDRE BLAKE |
20-5739 |
June 30, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 APPEARANCE filed for Appellee Johnny Fitz by Nicholas S. Bolduc. Certificate of Service: 06/30/2020. [20-5739] (NB) [Entered: 06/30/2020 04:00 PM] |
Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Antoinette Macon (ASM) [Entered: 06/30/2020 02:28 PM] |
Filing 1 Prisoner Case Docketed with certificate of appealability denied. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. DeAndre Blake. Transcript needed: n. (ASM) [Entered: 06/30/2020 02:15 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: DeAndre Blake v. Johnny Fitz | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: JOHNNY FITZ, Acting Warden | |
Represented By: | Nicholas Bolduc |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: DEANDRE BLAKE | |
Represented By: | DeAndre Blake |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.