USA v. Raymond Duong
| RAYMOND CONG DUONG |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 20-6048 |
| September 14, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 RULING to extend appointment of Mr. John C. Helmuth for Raymond Cong Duong as counsel under the Criminal Justice Act. (CAM) [Entered: 09/14/2020 02:25 PM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: C. Anthony Milton (CAM) [Entered: 09/14/2020 02:25 PM] |
| Filing 1 Criminal Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Raymond Cong Duong. Transcript needed: y. (CAM) [Entered: 09/14/2020 02:23 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Raymond Duong | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: RAYMOND CONG DUONG | |
| Represented By: | John C. Helmuth |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | David Kiebler |
| Represented By: | Rajbir Datta |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
