William Sutherland v. Pat Warren, et al
KIM FARRIS, JOHN DOE, PAT WARREN, CHARLES S. JAMSEN, MD, HEATHER COOPER, KEITH PAPENDICK, MD, CORIZON HEALTH INC., L. MCCARTHY, HUM, ARUS HARTNAGEL, RUM KING, LANA MCCARTHY, HUM and CORIZON HEALTH, INC. |
WILLIAM G. SUTHERLAND |
21-1058 |
January 20, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 APPEARANCE filed for Appellees Pat Warren, Lana McCarthy, King and Arus Hartnagel by Josh Marcum. Certificate of Service: 02/25/2021. [21-1058] (JDM) [Entered: 02/25/2021 11:28 AM] |
Filing 6 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting pro se briefing schedule: appellant brief due 04/05/2021;. appellee brief due 05/06/2021;. (BSM) [Entered: 02/19/2021 02:31 PM] |
Filing 5 Update fee status change to paid. Receipt No. DET134143 (BSM) [Entered: 02/19/2021 02:27 PM] |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Attorney Ms. Wedad Suleiman for Appellees Corizon Health, Inc., Kim Farris, Doctor Charles S. Jamsen and Keith Papendick Certificate of Service: 02/18/2021. [21-1058] (WS) [Entered: 02/18/2021 03:57 PM] |
Filing 3 APPEARANCE filed for Appellees Corizon Health, Inc., Kim Farris, Doctor Charles S. Jamsen and Keith Papendick by Wedad Suleiman (P81970). Certificate of Service: 02/18/2021. [21-1058] (WS) [Entered: 02/18/2021 03:53 PM] |
Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Briston Mitchell (BSM) [Entered: 01/20/2021 03:33 PM] |
Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant William G. Sutherland. Transcript needed: n. (BSM) [Entered: 01/20/2021 03:30 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.