NLRB v. Novelty Advertising Company
| NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD |
| NOVELTY ADVERTISING COMPANY |
| 21-1159 |
| February 17, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 FILED: Proposed Judgment by Mr. David Habenstreit for NLRB. Certificate of Service: 02/17/2021. (JEC) [Entered: 02/17/2021 03:03 PM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Jill Colyer (JEC) [Entered: 02/17/2021 03:00 PM] |
| Filing 1 NLRB Case Docketed, for enforcement. Notice filed by Petitioner NLRB. Petition Received in 6CA: 02/17/2021. (JEC) [Entered: 02/17/2021 02:56 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: NLRB v. Novelty Advertising Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: NOVELTY ADVERTISING COMPANY | |
| Represented By: | Gregory R. Coffman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD | |
| Represented By: | David Habenstreit |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
