Arthur Jackson v. Catherine Bauman, et al
| ARTHUR JACKSON |
| MR. K. BERGMAN, Prison Counselor, J. STYES, Food Supervisor, MR. [UNKNOWN] KENYON, Prison Employee, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director, CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden, [UNKNOWN] MITCHELL, [UNKNOWN] PERKINS, MR. [UNKNOWN] FARLEY, Housing Unit RUM, UNKNOWN PARTIES #1, Named as John/Jane Does, Health Unit Manager, [UNKNOWN] SMUTEX, Correctional Officer, MR. KENYON, Prison Employee, MR. FARLEY, Housing Unit RUM and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SMUTEX |
| 21-1328 |
| April 6, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 LETTER SENT to Mr. Arthur Jackson returning unfiled correspondence. (MTW) [Entered: 05/06/2021 02:23 PM] |
Filing 5
ORDER filed: It is ordered that the appeal is DISMISSED (non-final order). Decision not for publication. R. Guy Cole, Jr., Chief Circuit Judge; Ronald Lee Gilman, Circuit Judge and David W. McKeague, Circuit Judge. (MTW) [Entered: 04/21/2021 02:06 PM]
|
| Filing 4 Copy of District Court Order filed 04/14/2021 at RE #15 denying in forma pauperis. (MTW) [Entered: 04/19/2021 09:36 AM] |
| Filing 3 Appellant MOTION filed by Arthur Jackson for enlargement of time. Certificate of service: 04/12/2021. (MTW) [Entered: 04/16/2021 04:59 PM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Maria Welker (MTW) [Entered: 04/06/2021 10:51 AM] |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Arthur Jackson. Transcript needed: n. (MTW) [Entered: 04/06/2021 10:46 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
