Curtis Harris Bey v. Gregory Hissong, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: CURTIS HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee: GREGORY HISSONG, Food Service Director, JENNIFER JONES, Food Service Cook, CHARLES RANDLE, Food Service Supervisor and MATTHEW HARPST, Classification Director
Case Number: 21-2883
Filed: August 31, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 1, 2021 Filing 6 APPEARANCE filed for Appellees Gregory Hissong, Jennifer Jones, Charles Randle and Matthew Harpst by Scott Rothermel (P70711). Certificate of Service: 10/01/2021. [21-2883] (SRR) [Entered: 10/01/2021 02:36 PM]
September 30, 2021 Filing 5 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting pro se briefing schedule: appellant brief due 11/12/2021. appellee brief due 12/15/2021. (JAC) [Entered: 09/30/2021 01:39 PM]
September 30, 2021 Filing 4 Copy of District Court Order (RE #44) filed September 8, 2021 granting in forma pauperis. (JAC) [Entered: 09/30/2021 01:36 PM]
September 14, 2021 Filing 3 APPEARANCE filed for Appellees Gregory Hissong, Jennifer Jones, Charles Randle and Matthew Harpst by Joshua Marcum. Certificate of Service: 09/14/2021. [21-2883] (JDM) [Entered: 09/14/2021 10:41 AM]
August 31, 2021 Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Julie Connor (JAC) [Entered: 08/31/2021 11:50 AM]
August 31, 2021 Filing 1 Prisoner Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Curtis Harris. Transcript needed: n. (JAC) [Entered: 08/31/2021 11:47 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Curtis Harris Bey v. Gregory Hissong, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: CURTIS HARRIS
Represented By: Curtis Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: GREGORY HISSONG, Food Service Director
Represented By: Joshua Douglas Marcum
Represented By: Scott R. Rothermel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JENNIFER JONES, Food Service Cook
Represented By: Joshua Douglas Marcum
Represented By: Scott R. Rothermel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CHARLES RANDLE, Food Service Supervisor
Represented By: Joshua Douglas Marcum
Represented By: Scott R. Rothermel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MATTHEW HARPST, Classification Director
Represented By: Joshua Douglas Marcum
Represented By: Scott R. Rothermel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?