USA v. Corey Mills
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| COREY ALEXANDER MILLS |
| 21-2990 |
| September 30, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 RULING (non-document) to extend appointment of Mr. Christopher W Quinn, II for Corey Alexander Mills as counsel under the Criminal Justice Act. (RLB) [Entered: 09/30/2021 02:56 PM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Robin L. Baker (RLB) [Entered: 09/30/2021 02:55 PM] |
| Filing 1 Criminal Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant USA. Transcript needed: y. (RLB) [Entered: 09/30/2021 02:49 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Corey Mills | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Andrew Picek |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: COREY ALEXANDER MILLS | |
| Represented By: | Christopher W. Quinn II |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.