In re: Kareem Jackson
| In re: KAREEM M. JACKSON |
| WARDEN, CHILLICOTHE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION |
| 21-3102 |
| February 4, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 REPLY filed by Mr. Alan C. Rossman for Kareem M. Jackson regarding Warden's Memorandum in Opposition to Jackson's Application for Second Petition and Motion to Remand (RE 10) Certificate of Service: 02/23/2021. [21-3102] (ACR) [Entered: 02/23/2021 11:24 AM] |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE in opposition filed regarding a motion to remand case, [ # 9 ]; previously filed by Mr. Alan C. Rossman for Kareem M. Jackson, regarding a motion, [ # 8 ]; previously filed by Mr. Alan C. Rossman for Kareem M. Jackson. Response from Attorney Mr. Stephen E. Maher for Respondent Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution. Certificate of Service: 02/18/2021. [21-3102] (SEM) [Entered: 02/18/2021 02:06 PM] |
| Filing 9 MOTION filed by Alan C. Rossman & Bevlynn J. Sledge for Kareem M. Jackson to remand. Certificate of Service: 02/18/2021. [21-3102]--[Edited 02/18/2021 by PJE] (ACR) [Entered: 02/18/2021 12:34 PM] |
| Filing 8 Corrected second successive motion filed by Mr. Alan C. Rossman for Kareem M. Jackson. If the respondent chooses to file a response, it is due in 14 days. Certificate of Service: 02/18/2021. [21-3102] (ACR) [Entered: 02/18/2021 12:31 PM] |
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE filed for Movant Kareem M. Jackson by Bevlynn J. Sledge. Certificate of Service: 02/10/2021. [21-3102] (BJS) [Entered: 02/10/2021 10:11 AM] |
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE filed for Movant Kareem M. Jackson by Alan C. Rossman. Certificate of Service: 02/10/2021. [21-3102] (ACR) [Entered: 02/10/2021 10:08 AM] |
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE filed for Respondent Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution by Stephen E. Maher. Certificate of Service: 02/05/2021. [21-3102] (SEM) [Entered: 02/05/2021 03:04 PM] |
| Filing 4 RULING LETTER SENT to counsel, Alan Rossman directing Movant Kareem M. Jackson to file a corrected second successive habeas motion no later than February 18, 2021. (PJE) [Entered: 02/04/2021 02:42 PM] |
| Filing 3 The case manager for this case is: Patricia Elder (PJE) [Entered: 02/04/2021 02:41 PM] |
| Filing 2 Copy of District Court Order filed 2/2/21 R.11 to transfer proceedings to to the 6CA as a death penalty second successive (PJE) [Entered: 02/04/2021 02:40 PM] |
| Filing 1 TRANSFERRED Second Successive Death Penalty Case Docketed. Notice filed by Movant Kareem M. Jackson. 2nd/Successive Motion Received in 6CA: 02/02/2021. (PJE) [Entered: 02/04/2021 02:39 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Kareem Jackson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: KAREEM M. JACKSON | |
| Represented By: | Alan C. Rossman |
| Represented By: | Bevlynn Joann Sledge |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: WARDEN, CHILLICOTHE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION | |
| Represented By: | Stephen E. Maher |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
