In re: Robert Reese
In re: ROBERT L. REESE, Derivatively on Behalf of Defendant Fifth Third Bancorp |
21-3378 |
April 21, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER filed : DENIED the petition for a writ of mandamus. Richard Allen Griffin, Circuit Judge; Raymond M. Kethledge, Circuit Judge and Eric E. Murphy, Circuit Judge. (JEC) [Entered: 07/30/2021 09:17 AM] |
Filing 3 Petition for Review filing fee paid Mr. Andrew Paul Kimble for Robert L. Reese. Fee Amount: $500.00 Receipt Number: A06-70238-698.. [21-3378] (APK) [Entered: 05/28/2021 11:20 AM] |
Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Jill Colyer (JEC) [Entered: 04/21/2021 10:29 AM] |
Filing 1 Writ of Mandamus filed. Notice filed by Petitioner Robert L. Reese. Petition Received in 6CA: 04/20/2021. (JEC) [Entered: 04/21/2021 10:25 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: In re: Robert Reese | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: In re: ROBERT L. REESE, Derivatively on Behalf of Defendant Fifth Third Bancorp | |
Represented By: | Alfred G. Yates Jr. |
Represented By: | Andrew Paul Kimble |
Represented By: | Robert V. Prongay |
Represented By: | Benjamin I. Sachs-Michaels |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.