Eric Kohler v. Cty of Cincinnati, OH, et al
Defendant: UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS 1-10
Defendant / Appellee: MAYOR JOHN CRANLEY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and CITY OF CINCINNATI, OH
Plaintiff / Appellant: ERIC KOHLER, On behalf of himself all others similarly situated and ERIC KOHLER, On behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Case Number: 21-3466
Filed: May 19, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 22, 2021 Filing 23 REPLY filed by Mr. Christopher David Wiest for Eric Kohler regarding Plaintiff's Motion for Injunction Pending Appeal Certificate of Service: 06/22/2021. [21-3466] (CDW) [Entered: 06/22/2021 04:07 PM]
June 18, 2021 Filing 22 RESPONSE in opposition filed regarding a motion, [ # 5 ]; previously filed by Mr. Christopher David Wiest for Eric Kohler. Response from Attorney Mr. William Christopher Hicks for Appellees City of Cincinnati, OH and John Cranley. Certificate of Service: 06/18/2021. [21-3466] (WCH) [Entered: 06/18/2021 03:52 PM]
June 17, 2021 Filing 21 RESPONSE in opposition filed regarding a motion for injunction pending appeal, [ # 5 ]; previously filed by Mr. Christopher David Wiest for Eric Kohler. Response from Attorney Mr. Brant Levine for Appellee USA. Certificate of Service: 06/17/2021. [21-3466] (BL) [Entered: 06/17/2021 09:34 PM]
June 4, 2021 Filing 20 RULING LETTER SENT granting Mayor John Cranley and the City of Cincinnati motion extend time to file a response to the plaintiff's motion for injuction pending appeal [ # 18 ] filed by Mr. William Christopher Hicks. Response is now due on or before June 18, 2021. (RGF) [Entered: 06/04/2021 08:54 AM]
June 3, 2021 Filing 19 Mediation Office is no longer involved in this appeal. (LMR) [Entered: 06/03/2021 04:19 PM]
June 3, 2021 Filing 18 MOTION filed by Mr. William Christopher Hicks for City of Cincinnati, OH and John Cranley to extend timeCertificate of Service: 06/03/2021. [21-3466] (WCH) [Entered: 06/03/2021 04:13 PM]
June 3, 2021 Filing 17 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Attorney Mr. William Christopher Hicks for Appellees City of Cincinnati, OH and John Cranley Certificate of Service: 06/03/2021. [21-3466] (WCH) [Entered: 06/03/2021 04:10 PM]
June 3, 2021 Filing 16 APPEARANCE filed for Appellees City of Cincinnati, OH and John Cranley by William C. Hicks. Certificate of Service: 06/03/2021. [21-3466] (WCH) [Entered: 06/03/2021 04:06 PM]
June 3, 2021 Filing 15 Letter sent by Mediation Office REGARDING MEDIATION: The Mediation Conference scheduled for 06/18/2021 is hereby canceled. (LMR) [Entered: 06/03/2021 02:35 PM]
June 3, 2021 Filing 14 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Attorney Mr. Christopher David Wiest for Appellant Eric Kohler Certificate of Service: 06/03/2021. [21-3466] (CDW) [Entered: 06/03/2021 12:23 PM]
June 3, 2021 Filing 13 CIVIL APPEAL STATEMENT OF PARTIES AND ISSUES filed by Attorney Mr. Christopher David Wiest for Appellant Eric Kohler.. Certificate of Service: 06/03/2021. [21-3466] (CDW) [Entered: 06/03/2021 12:22 PM]
June 3, 2021 Filing 12 APPEARANCE filed for Appellant Eric Kohler by Christopher D Wiest. Certificate of Service: 06/03/2021. [21-3466] (CDW) [Entered: 06/03/2021 12:21 PM]
June 2, 2021 Filing 11 RULING LETTER SENT granting the Government's motion to extend the time to file a response to the plaintiff's motion for injuction pending appeal [ # 10 ] filed by Mr. Brant Levine. Response is now due on or before June 18, 2021. (RGF) [Entered: 06/02/2021 05:08 PM]
June 2, 2021 Filing 10 MOTION filed by Mr. Brant Levine for USA to extend time to respond to plaintiff's motion for an injunction pending appeal. Certificate of Service: 06/02/2021. [21-3466] (BL) [Entered: 06/02/2021 12:06 PM]
June 2, 2021 Filing 9 APPEARANCE filed for Appellant Eric Kohler by Thomas B Bruns. Certificate of Service: 06/02/2021. [21-3466] (TBB) [Entered: 06/02/2021 06:28 AM]
June 1, 2021 Filing 8 LOCKED - COUNSEL KINDLY ADVISED TO REFILE AS A NON MODIFIABLE DOCUMENT****PLEASE contact the Court with any questions. APPEARANCE filed for Appellant Eric Kohler by Thomas B Bruns. Certificate of Service: 06/01/2021. [21-3466]--[Edited 06/01/2021 by RGF] (TBB) [Entered: 06/01/2021 07:22 AM]
May 26, 2021 Filing 7 APPEARANCE filed for Appellee USA by Thomas E. Chandler. Certificate of Service: 05/26/2021. [21-3466] (TEC) [Entered: 05/26/2021 01:16 PM]
May 26, 2021 Filing 6 APPEARANCE filed for Appellee USA by Brant S. Levine. Certificate of Service: 05/26/2021. [21-3466] (BL) [Entered: 05/26/2021 01:05 PM]
May 25, 2021 Filing 5 MOTION filed by Mr. Christopher David Wiest for Eric Kohler for injunction pending appeal. Certificate of Service: 05/25/2021. [21-3466] (CDW) [Entered: 05/25/2021 02:59 PM]
May 20, 2021 Filing 4 MEDIATOR-INITIATED CALL: A Telephone Mediation conference has been scheduled for 06/18/2021 at 9:30 AM (ET) with Scott Coburn. [Please open notice for important details and deadlines.] (LMR) [Entered: 05/20/2021 11:44 AM]
May 20, 2021 Filing 3 Mediation Office is involved in this appeal. (LMR) [Entered: 05/20/2021 11:42 AM]
May 19, 2021 Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Mr. Roy G. Ford (513) 564-7016 (RGF) [Entered: 05/19/2021 03:08 PM]
May 19, 2021 Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Eric Kohler. Transcript needed: y. (RGF) [Entered: 05/19/2021 03:03 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Eric Kohler v. Cty of Cincinnati, OH, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MAYOR JOHN CRANLEY
Represented By: William Christopher Hicks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Amber Trzinski Fox
Represented By: Brant Levine
Represented By: Thomas E. Chandler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CITY OF CINCINNATI, OH
Represented By: William Christopher Hicks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: ERIC KOHLER, On behalf of himself all others similarly situated
Represented By: Christopher David Wiest
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: ERIC KOHLER, On behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Represented By: Christopher David Wiest
Represented By: Thomas Bernard Bruns
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?