Andrew Mitchell, et al v. Cty of Cincinnati, OH, et al
| ANDREW MITCHELL and DAVID SCHOFIELD |
| CITY OF CINCINNATI, OH and MAYOR JOHN CRANLEY |
| BRIAN NORRIS |
| 21-4061 |
| November 15, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Andrew Mitchell v. City of Cincinnati |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 26 Mediation Office is no longer involved in this appeal. (LMR) [Entered: 01/12/2022 03:40 PM] |
| Filing 25 Letter sent by Mediation Office REGARDING MEDIATION: The Mediation Conference scheduled for 01/13/2022 is hereby canceled. (LMR) [Entered: 01/12/2022 03:40 PM] |
| Filing 24 CIVIL APPEAL STATEMENT OF PARTIES AND ISSUES filed by Attorney Mr. Christopher David Wiest for Appellants Andrew Mitchell and David Schofield.. Certificate of Service: 12/17/2021. [21-4061] (CDW) [Entered: 12/17/2021 04:03 PM] |
| Filing 23 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Attorney Mr. Christopher David Wiest for Appellants Andrew Mitchell and David Schofield Certificate of Service: 12/17/2021. [21-4061] (CDW) [Entered: 12/17/2021 04:02 PM] |
| Filing 22 BRIEFING LETTER SENT by Mediation Office, resetting briefing schedule: appellant brief now due 01/27/2022. appellee brief now due 02/24/2022. (CAW) [Entered: 12/02/2021 02:47 PM] |
| Filing 21 MEDIATOR-INITIATED CALL: The Mediation conference has been rescheduled for 01/13/2022 at 9:30 am EASTERN TIME with Kathryn Wollenburg. [Please open notice for important details and deadlines.] (CAW) [Entered: 12/02/2021 02:45 PM] |
| Filing 20 APPEARANCE filed for Appellees City of Cincinnati, OH and John Cranley by Emily Smart Woerner. Certificate of Service: 12/01/2021. [21-4061] (EEW) [Entered: 12/01/2021 04:07 PM] |
| Filing 19 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Attorney Mr. William Christopher Hicks for Appellees City of Cincinnati, OH and John Cranley Certificate of Service: 12/01/2021. [21-4061] (WCH) [Entered: 12/01/2021 03:52 PM] |
| Filing 18 LOCKED -- COUNSEL KINDLY ADVISED TO REFILE UNDER OWN PACER ACCOUNT*********APPEARANCE filed for Appellees City of Cincinnati, OH and John Cranley by Emily Smary Woerner. Certificate of Service: 12/01/2021. [21-4061]--[Edited 12/01/2021 by RGF] (WCH) [Entered: 12/01/2021 03:51 PM] |
| Filing 17 APPEARANCE filed for Appellees City of Cincinnati, OH and John Cranley by William Hicks. Certificate of Service: 12/01/2021. [21-4061] (WCH) [Entered: 12/01/2021 03:50 PM] |
Filing 16
ORDER filed - The motion for injunction pending appeal is DENIED. Richard F. Suhrheinrich, R. Guy Cole, Jr., and John K. Bush, Circuit Judges. (RGF) [Entered: 11/30/2021 05:02 PM]
|
| Filing 15 RESPONSE in opposition filed regarding a motion for injunction pending appeal, [ # 5 ]; previously filed by Mr. Christopher David Wiest for Andrew Mitchell and David Schofield. Response from Attorney Ms. Donyetta D. Bailey for Appellee Brian Norris. Certificate of Service: 11/26/2021. [21-4061] (DDB) [Entered: 11/26/2021 09:34 PM] |
| Filing 14 APPEARANCE filed for Appellee Brian Norris by Donyetta D. Bailey. Certificate of Service: 11/26/2021. [21-4061] (DDB) [Entered: 11/26/2021 09:30 PM] |
Filing 13
MEDIATION OFFICE is involved in this appeal. MEDIATOR-INITIATED CALL: A Mediation conference has been scheduled for 12/08/2021 at 9:30 AM (ET) with Kathryn Wollenburg. [Please open notice for important details and deadlines.] (LMR) [Entered: 11/16/2021 03:51 PM]
|
Filing 12
APPEARANCE filed for Appellants Andrew Mitchell and David Schofield by Thomas B. Bruns. Certificate of Service: 11/16/2021. [21-4061] (TBB) [Entered: 11/16/2021 03:50 PM]
|
Filing 11
LETTER SENT Mr. William Christopher Hicks for City of Cincinnati, OH and John Cranley, to Ms. Donyetta D. Bailey for Brian Norris for an extension of time to file a response to Plaintiffs Emergency motion for injunction pending appeal. Response is now due on or before November 26, 2021. (RGF) [Entered: 11/16/2021 01:27 PM]
|
Filing 9
APPEARANCE filed for Appellants David Schofield and Andrew Mitchell by Zachary Gottesman. Certificate of Service: 11/15/2021. [21-4061] (ZG) [Entered: 11/15/2021 10:42 AM]
|
Filing 8
DEFICIENCY NOTICE: The appearance form , [ # 7 ], filed by Mr. Zachary Gottesman for Andrew Mitchell and David Schofield is deficient for the reason noted on the attached checklist. Deficiency to be corrected by 11/22/2021. (RGF) [Entered: 11/15/2021 10:19 AM]
|
Filing 7
LOCKED - COUNSEL ADVISED TO REFILE DOCUMENT*****APPEARANCE filed for Appellants Andrew Mitchell and David Schofield by Zachary Gottesman. Certificate of Service: 11/15/2021. [21-4061] (ZG) [Entered: 11/15/2021 10:07 AM]
|
Filing 6
BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting briefing schedule: appellant brief due 12/27/2021;. appellee brief due 01/24/2022; (RGF) [Entered: 11/15/2021 10:06 AM]
|
Filing 5
PLAINTIFF'S EMERGENCY MOTION filed by Mr. Christopher David Wiest for Andrew Mitchell and David Schofield for injunction pending appeal. Certificate of Service: 11/15/2021. [21-4061] (CDW) [Entered: 11/15/2021 09:51 AM]
|
Filing 4
TRANSCRIPT ORDER filed - transcript is already on file in the District Court Clerks Office. Filed by Mr. Christopher David Wiest for Andrew Mitchell and David Schofield. fCertificate of Service: 11/15/2021. [21-4061] (CDW) [Entered: 11/15/2021 09:50 AM]
|
Filing 3
APPEARANCE filed for Appellants David Schofield and Andrew Mitchell by Christopher D Wiest. Certificate of Service: 11/15/2021. [21-4061] (CDW) [Entered: 11/15/2021 09:49 AM]
|
Filing 2
The case manager for this case is: Mr. Roy G. Ford (513) 564-7016 (RGF) [Entered: 11/15/2021 09:15 AM]
|
Filing 1
Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellants Andrew Mitchell and David Schofield. Transcript needed: y. (RGF) [Entered: 11/15/2021 09:09 AM]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.