Faye Hobson, et al v. Mark Esper
| GLADYS BLOUNT, DESMA BLOUNT, JOYCE DIGGS, TAMARA GAFFNEY, ROBBIE SWINT, MAY REATHER WILIS, LORENZO BROWN, JANOR JACKSON, NANCY ELLEN WHITAKER and REDALE BENTON-FLORES |
| FAYE RENNELL HOBSON |
| MARK T. ESPER, Secretary, United States Department of Defense |
| 21-5093 |
| January 29, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting pro se briefing schedule: appellant brief due 04/23/2021;. appellee brief due 05/26/2021;. (CAM) [Entered: 03/11/2021 08:47 AM] |
| Filing 7 Update fee status change to paid. (CAM) [Entered: 03/11/2021 08:45 AM] |
| Filing 6 Appellant MOTION filed by Ms. Faye Rennell Hobson for corrections to the record. Certificate of service: 03/05/2021. (CAM) [Entered: 03/11/2021 08:43 AM] |
| Filing 5 NOTIFICATION filed by Ms. Faye Rennell Hobson regarding receipt of documents. Certificate of Service: 03/05/2021. (CAM) [Entered: 03/11/2021 08:41 AM] |
| Filing 4 The case manager for this case is now: Charles Anthony Milton (JEC) [Entered: 03/04/2021 08:52 AM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE filed for Appellee Doctor Mark T. Esper by Mercedes. C. Maynor-Faulcon. Certificate of Service: 02/26/2021. [21-5093] (MCM) [Entered: 02/26/2021 10:59 AM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Jill Colyer (JEC) [Entered: 01/29/2021 10:57 AM] |
| Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Ms. Faye Rennell Hobson. Transcript needed: n. (JEC) [Entered: 01/29/2021 10:53 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
