Bobby NashIn re: Bobby Nash
In re: BOBBY KENNETH NASH |
TONY MAYS |
21-5134 |
February 16, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 The case manager for this case is: Briston Mitchell (BSM) [Entered: 02/16/2021 03:37 PM] |
Filing 2 RULING LETTER SENT directing Movant Bobby Kenneth Nash to file a corrected second successive habeas motion. (BSM) [Entered: 02/16/2021 03:30 PM] |
Filing 1 Second Successive Motion Docketed. Notice filed by Movant Bobby Kenneth Nash. 2nd/Successive Motion Received in 6CA: 02/08/2021. (BSM) [Entered: 02/16/2021 03:29 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Bobby NashIn re: Bobby Nash | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: TONY MAYS | |
Represented By: | John H. Bledsoe |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: In re: BOBBY KENNETH NASH | |
Represented By: | Bobby Kenneth Nash |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.