Glendrick Gardner v. Russell Scott, et al
| WILLIAM JONES, LFUCG Yard Waste Supervisor, JEREMY HOBBS, Formerly HR, RUSSELL SCOTT, Formerly AM Ops Manager, Program Manager, Sr. and WILLIE KAY LEWIS, Formerly Program Manager, Sr. |
| GLENDRICK GARDNER |
| 21-5360 |
| April 9, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 APPELLANT BRIEF TENDERED. Received from Mr. Glendrick Gardner. Certificate of Service: 05/05/2021. (RLJ) [Entered: 05/07/2021 07:28 AM] |
| Filing 6 SHOW CAUSE order filed: It is therefore ordered that Gardner show cause in writing not later than twenty-one days from the date of this order why the appeal should not be dismissed for failure to comply with 28 U.S.C. 2107(a) and Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a). It is further ordered that the briefing schedule be held in abeyance. Response due by 05/05/2021. (RLJ) [Entered: 04/14/2021 08:07 AM] |
| Filing 5 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting pro se briefing schedule: appellant brief due 05/25/2021. (RLJ) [Entered: 04/12/2021 11:15 AM] |
| Filing 4 Copy of District Court Order filed 04/12/21 granting in forma pauperis. (RLJ) [Entered: 04/12/2021 11:13 AM] |
| Filing 3 Defendant not served in district court, complaint dismissed prior to service. (RLJ) [Entered: 04/09/2021 09:42 AM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Robin Johnson (RLJ) [Entered: 04/09/2021 09:40 AM] |
| Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Glendrick Gardner. Transcript needed: n. (RLJ) [Entered: 04/09/2021 09:33 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
