Clark Frazier v. Tory Dollar, et al
| TORY DOLLAR, individual capacity, CHRISTOPHER MORLEY, CRAIG MURWIN, individual capacity and ETHAN RICHARDSON, individual capacity |
| CLARK DERRICK FRAZIER |
| 21-5407 |
| April 20, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 RULING LETTER SENT to extend time to pay fee. The appellant has 30 days to pay the $505.00 appellate filing fee to the U.S. District Court or file a motion for pauper status in this court. (SSS) [Entered: 06/08/2021 09:49 AM] |
| Filing 6 Copy of District Court Order filed 06/07/2021 denying in forma pauperis. (SSS) [Entered: 06/08/2021 09:30 AM] |
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE filed for Appellee Tory Dollar by Eric D. Reach. Certificate of Service: 05/04/2021. [21-5407] (EDR) [Entered: 05/04/2021 09:55 AM] |
| Filing 4 4A4 ORDER from district court filed 04/26/2021. Case opening letter sent directing appellant to either pay the $505.00 filing fee or file a motion for pauper status with the district court. (SSS) [Entered: 05/04/2021 08:39 AM] |
| Filing 3 4a4 Notice filed. Case held in abeyance pending a ruling on the Motion to Alter Judgment and/or Reconsideration filed in the District Court 04/12/2021, Re #142. (SSS) [Entered: 04/20/2021 12:24 PM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Sharday Swain (SSS) [Entered: 04/20/2021 12:23 PM] |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Clark Derrick Frazier. Transcript needed: n. (SSS) [Entered: 04/20/2021 12:21 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
