USA v. Christopher Cannon
CHRISTOPHER LAMONT CANNON |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
21-5415 |
April 22, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 The case manager for this case is: Michelle R. Lambert (MRL) [Entered: 04/22/2021 12:34 PM] |
Filing 2 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting expedited briefing schedule: appellant brief now due 05/24/2021. appellee brief now due 06/07/2021. (MRL) [Entered: 04/22/2021 12:31 PM] |
Filing 1 Criminal Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Christopher Lamont Cannon. Transcript needed: n. (MRL) [Entered: 04/22/2021 12:20 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: USA v. Christopher Cannon | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: CHRISTOPHER LAMONT CANNON | |
Represented By: | Christopher Lamont Cannon |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Andrew Notaristefano |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.