In re: James Berry
| In re: JAMES HENRY BERRY |
| BRAD ADAMS, Warden |
| 21-5445 |
| April 30, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 RULING LETTER SENT directing Movant James Henry Berry to file a corrected second successive habeas motionn on or before June 01, 2021. (SSS) [Entered: 04/30/2021 09:41 AM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Sharday Swain (SSS) [Entered: 04/30/2021 09:40 AM] |
| Filing 1 Second Successive Motion Docketed. Notice filed by Movant James Henry Berry. 2nd/Successive Motion Received in 6CA: 04/26/2021. (SSS) [Entered: 04/30/2021 09:39 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: James Berry | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: BRAD ADAMS, Warden | |
| Represented By: | Todd D. Ferguson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: JAMES HENRY BERRY | |
| Represented By: | James Henry Berry |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
