USA v. Nathan Marlow
| NATHAN S. MARLOW |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 21-5622 |
| June 28, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 RULING to extend appointment of Mr. Corey Bryant Shipley for Nathan S. Marlow as counsel under the Criminal Justice Act. (MTW) [Entered: 06/28/2021 02:11 PM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Maria Welker (MTW) [Entered: 06/28/2021 02:09 PM] |
| Filing 1 Criminal Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Nathan S. Marlow. Transcript needed: y. (MTW) [Entered: 06/28/2021 02:04 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Nathan Marlow | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: NATHAN S. MARLOW | |
| Represented By: | Corey Bryant Shipley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Anne-Marie Svolto |
| Represented By: | Caryn L. Hebets |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
