USA v. Jonathan Luten
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| JONATHAN LYNN LUTEN |
| 21-5705 |
| July 26, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 RULING to extend appointment of Mr. Michael L. Weinman for Mr. Jonathan Lynn Luten as counsel under the Criminal Justice Act. (CAM) [Entered: 07/26/2021 01:01 PM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: C. Anthony Milton (CAM) [Entered: 07/26/2021 01:00 PM] |
| Filing 1 Criminal Case Docketed. Notice RE 158 filed by Appellant Mr. Jonathan Lynn Luten. Transcript needed: y. (CAM) [Entered: 07/26/2021 12:56 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Jonathan Luten | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Adam Chase Davis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: JONATHAN LYNN LUTEN | |
| Represented By: | Jonathan Lynn Luten |
| Represented By: | Michael L. Weinman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
