USA v. Jonathan Luten
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| JONATHAN LYNN LUTEN |
| 21-5715 |
| July 29, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER filed to dismiss as a duplicate appeal of case number 21-5678. 6th Cir. R. 45(a)(8). (CAM) [Entered: 07/30/2021 08:40 AM]
|
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: C. Anthony Milton (CAM) [Entered: 07/29/2021 10:25 AM] |
| Filing 1 Criminal Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Jonathan Lynn Luten. Transcript needed: n. (CAM) [Entered: 07/29/2021 10:23 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Jonathan Luten | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Adam Chase Davis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: JONATHAN LYNN LUTEN | |
| Represented By: | Jonathan Lynn Luten |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
