Demetrius Loyd v. Edith Hacker, et al
DEMETRIUS LOYD |
EDITH HACKER and MICHELLE SPURLOCK |
21-5776 |
August 18, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 PETITION for rehearing before original panel filed by Mr. Demetrius Loyd. Certificate of Service: 10/04/2021. (VLP) [Entered: 10/12/2021 12:15 PM] |
Filing 6 ORDER filed: The appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction, decision not for publication. (Late notice of appeal). Jeffrey S. Sutton, Chief Circuit Judge; Eugene E. Siler, Jr., Circuit Judge and John M. Rogers, Circuit Judge. (VLP) [Entered: 09/20/2021 03:31 PM] |
Filing 5 Copy of District Court Order filed 09/13/2021 RE#14 granting in forma pauperis. (VLP) [Entered: 09/14/2021 08:27 AM] |
Filing 4 Deficiency notice filed 08/19/2021 RE#11-. On or before September 17, 2021, Loyd must either pay the $505.00 appellate filing fee to the Clerk of this Court or comply with the following steps to pursue pauper status: (a) complete the Sixth Circuit Form 4; (b) have prison staff complete and sign the Certificate of Inmate Account; and (c) file both documents with this Court. (VLP) [Entered: 08/20/2021 11:30 AM] |
Filing 3 Defendant not served in district court, complaint dismissed prior to service. (VLP) [Entered: 08/18/2021 08:50 AM] |
Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Virginia Padgett (VLP) [Entered: 08/18/2021 08:49 AM] |
Filing 1 Prisoner Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Demetrius Loyd. Transcript needed: n. (VLP) [Entered: 08/18/2021 08:44 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.