Cory JohnsonIn re: Cory Johnson
In re: CORY JOHNSON |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
21-5918 |
September 29, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 RULING LETTER SENT directing Movant Cory Johnson to file a corrected second successive habeas motion. Corrected motion due 10/29/2021. (CAM) [Entered: 09/29/2021 10:29 AM] |
Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: C. Anthony Milton (CAM) [Entered: 09/29/2021 10:25 AM] |
Filing 1 Second Successive Motion Docketed. Notice filed by Movant Cory Johnson. 2nd/Successive Motion Received in 6CA: 09/22/2021. (CAM) [Entered: 09/29/2021 10:24 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Cory JohnsonIn re: Cory Johnson | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: In re: CORY JOHNSON | |
Represented By: | Cory Johnson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Kevin G. Ritz |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.