John Hanson, III v. USA, et al
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| JOHN WILLIAM HANSON, III |
| LESZEK KWIATKOWSKI, U.S. Park Ranger and DYLAN JONES, U.S. Park Ranger, individually |
| 21-6092 |
| November 18, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 SIGNED NOTICE OF APPEAL filed by Mr. John William Hanson, III. (MMP) [Entered: 12/07/2021 09:13 AM] |
| Filing 7 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting pro se briefing schedule: appellant brief due 01/17/2022; appellee brief due 02/17/2022. (JAC) [Entered: 12/03/2021 08:44 AM] |
| Filing 6 SIGNED NOTICE OF APPEAL filed by Mr. John William Hanson, III. (RGF) [Entered: 12/03/2021 07:37 AM] |
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE filed for Appellees Dylan Jones and Leszek Kwiatkowski by Joseph C. Rodriguez. Certificate of Service: 11/23/2021. [21-6092]--[Edited 11/24/2021 by MMP] (JCR) [Entered: 11/23/2021 10:51 AM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE filed for Appellees Dylan Jones, Leszek Kwiatkowski and USA by Joseph C. Rodriguez. Certificate of Service: 11/18/2021. [21-6092] (JCR) [Entered: 11/18/2021 03:51 PM] |
| Filing 3 LETTER SENT to Mr. John William Hanson, III, directing that the enclosed notice of appeal be signed and returned to this court by 12/02/2021. (MMP) [Entered: 11/18/2021 11:51 AM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Monica Page (MMP) [Entered: 11/18/2021 11:42 AM] |
| Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. John William Hanson, III. Transcript needed: n. (MMP) [Entered: 11/18/2021 11:35 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
