Joey Godwin
| In re: JOEY GODWIN |
| MARTIN FRINK, Warden |
| 21-6202 |
| December 17, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE filed for Respondent Martin Frink by John H. Bledsoe. Certificate of Service: 12/17/2021. [21-6202] (JHB) [Entered: 12/17/2021 03:59 PM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Antoinette Macon (ASM) [Entered: 12/17/2021 10:56 AM] |
| Filing 1 Second Successive Motion Docketed. Notice filed by Movant Mr. Joey Godwin. 2nd/Successive Motion Received in 6CA: 12/16/2021. (ASM) [Entered: 12/17/2021 10:51 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Joey Godwin | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: JOEY GODWIN | |
| Represented By: | Joey Godwin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MARTIN FRINK, Warden | |
| Represented By: | John H. Bledsoe |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
