Ernest Roybal v. State of Tennessee, et al
| ERNEST J. ROYBAL |
| STATE OF TENNESSEE, TENNESSEE MENTAL HEALTH INSTITUTE, HICKMAN COUNTY GENERAL SESSIONS COURT, TN, JUDGE AMY C. PUCKETT, PSYCHOLOGIST RENA HILL ISEN, Forensic Evaluator, KIM R. HELPER, District Attorney General, 21st Judicial District, BILL LEE, Governor of the State of Tennessee, HICKMAN COUNTY, TENNESSEE, HICKMAN COUNTY, TN GENERAL SESSIONS COURT and HICKMAN COUNTY, TN |
| 21-6213 |
| December 22, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Supplemental pleading filed by Party Mr. Ernest J. Roybal. (SSS) [Entered: 02/08/2022 11:29 AM] |
| Filing 7 APPELLANT BRIEF filed by Mr. Ernest J. Roybal. Argument Request: not received. (SSS) [Entered: 01/21/2022 01:17 PM] |
| Filing 6 SIGNED NOTICE OF APPEAL filed by Mr. Ernest J. Roybal. (SSS) [Entered: 01/19/2022 01:38 PM] |
| Filing 5 LETTER SENT to Mr. Ernest J. Roybal, directing that the enclosed notice of appeal be signed and returned to this court by 01/18/2022. (SSS) [Entered: 01/03/2022 10:32 AM] |
| Filing 4 Defendant not served in district court, complaint dismissed prior to service. (SSS) [Entered: 12/22/2021 11:08 AM] |
| Filing 3 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting pro se briefing schedule: appellant brief due 02/03/2022; appellee brief due 03/08/2022. (SSS) [Entered: 12/22/2021 11:04 AM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Sharday Swain (SSS) [Entered: 12/22/2021 11:00 AM] |
| Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Ernest J. Roybal. Transcript needed: n. (SSS) [Entered: 12/22/2021 10:56 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
