Kevin Cassaday v. AT&T Incorporated, et al
| KEVIN WILLIAM CASSADAY |
| AT&T INCORPORATED and DIRECTTV, INC. |
| 22-1152 |
| March 1, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. (MMP) [Entered: 06/02/2022 12:54 PM] |
Filing 6
ORDER filed: It is therefore ordered that this appeal is DISMISSED, decision not for publication. Danny J. Boggs, Circuit Judge; Amul R. Thapar, Circuit Judge and John B. Nalbandian, Circuit Judge. (MMP) [Entered: 06/02/2022 12:40 PM]
|
| Filing 5 RULING LETTER SENT to hold briefing in abeyance pending show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed for failure to comply with 28 U.S.C. 2107(a) and Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a). (MMP) [Entered: 03/08/2022 09:23 AM] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER filed: It is therefore ordered that Cassaday show cause in writing not later than twenty-one days from the date of this order why the appeal should not be dismissed for failure to comply with 28 U.S.C. 2107(a) and Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a). It is further ordered that the briefing schedule be held in abeyance (MMP) [Entered: 03/08/2022 09:10 AM]
|
| Filing 3 Defendant not served in district court, complaint dismissed prior to service. (MMP) [Entered: 03/01/2022 11:27 AM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Monica Page (MMP) [Entered: 03/01/2022 11:27 AM] |
| Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Kevin William Cassaday. Transcript needed: n. (MMP) [Entered: 03/01/2022 11:07 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
