USA v. Edwin Culp
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| EDWIN CULP |
| 22-1166 |
| March 3, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting expedited briefing schedule: appellant brief now due 03/18/2022. appellee brief now due 04/04/2022. (CAM) [Entered: 03/03/2022 03:15 PM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: C. Anthony Milton (CAM) [Entered: 03/03/2022 03:14 PM] |
| Filing 1 Criminal Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Edwin Culp. Transcript needed: n. (CAM) [Entered: 03/03/2022 03:11 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Edwin Culp | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Mark Steven Bilkovic |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: EDWIN CULP | |
| Represented By: | Michael R. Dezsi |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
