Carl MorrisIn re: Carl Morris
In re: CARL MORRIS, aka Carl Henry Pruitt |
MIKE BROWN, Warden |
22-1208 |
March 15, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 RULING LETTER SENT directing Movant Carl Morris to file a corrected second successive habeas motion. Corrected second successive motion now due April 14, 2022. (JAC) [Entered: 03/15/2022 02:58 PM] |
Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Julie Connor (JAC) [Entered: 03/15/2022 02:54 PM] |
Filing 1 Second Successive Motion Docketed. Notice filed by Movant Carl Morris. 2nd/Successive Motion Received in 6CA: 03/14/2022. (JAC) [Entered: 03/15/2022 02:53 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Carl MorrisIn re: Carl Morris | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: In re: CARL MORRIS, aka Carl Henry Pruitt | |
Represented By: | Carl Morris |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: MIKE BROWN, Warden | |
Represented By: | Andrea M. Christensen-Brown |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.