USA v. Cody Diggs
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| CODY DEVON DIGGS |
| 22-1268 |
| April 1, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE filed for Appellee USA by Daniel Y. Mekaru. Certificate of Service: 04/05/2022. [22-1268] (DYM) [Entered: 04/05/2022 03:11 PM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: C. Anthony Milton (CAM) [Entered: 04/01/2022 09:40 AM] |
| Filing 1 Criminal Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Cody Devon Diggs. Transcript needed: y. (CAM) [Entered: 04/01/2022 09:37 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Cody Diggs | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Daniel Y. Mekaru |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: CODY DEVON DIGGS | |
| Represented By: | Joanna Christine Kloet |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
